SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Guj) 798

P.B.MAJMUDAR
HUSENABIBI, AMIRBHAI YASINBHAI – Appellant
Versus
ABDULMIYA KASAMMIYA KURESHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.K.Trivedi, HARIN P.RAVAL, HINA DESAI

( 1 ) BY filing this Appeal under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, the appellants have challenged the judgement and decree of of the learned Judge, City Civil Court, Ahmedabad dated 15-2-1994 passed in Civil Suit No. 3399/1985. By the aforesaid judgement and decree, the learned trial Judge has dismissed the suit filed by the appellants " plaintiffs for getting decree for specific performance of the suit agreement. It is the case of the plaintiffs that there is a property belonging to the defendants no. 1 to 3, which is situated in Dariapur Ward No. 1 in Bukhara Mohalla, description of which is given in para 1 of the plaint. The plaintiffs were occupying first floor in the suit house as tenants. The said tenanted portion is having Municipal Census no. 2724/1 and 2724/2. It is the case of the plaintiffs that they were occupying the aforesaid portion as a tenant of defendant nos. 1 to 3. It is the case of the plaintiffs that defendants no. 1 to 3 wanted to sell the suit property and, therefore, they executed an agreement to sell in favour of the plaintiffs on 28-5-1982 and earnest money of Rs. 2,800/- was paid by the plaintiffs to said defendants No. 1 to 3. As per the case of























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top