SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Guj) 112

BANKIM N.MEHTA
RAMDEV FOOD PRODUCTS PVT. LTD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: CHETAN K.PANDYA, S.S.PATEL

BANKIM N. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has, by this petition filed under art. 226 of the Constitution of India, made a prayer to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate order for quashing and setting aside the order dated 16-8-2005 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First class, Sanand directing the Police Sub-Inspector of Sanand to inquire under Sec. 202 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, into the complaint lodged by the petitioner against fourteen accused named therein for alleged commission of offences under Secs. 419, 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 read with Secs. 120b and 114 of Indian Penal Code and submit report to the Court within 30 days and has further prayed the Court to direct the Police Sub-Inspector, Sanand Police station to investigate under Sec. 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in brief code ).

( 2 ) THE facts of the case emerging from the record are that the petitioner filed a complaint in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Sanand against fourteen accused named therein for the offences alleged to have been committed under Secs. 419 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 read with Secs. 120b, 34 and 114 of













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top