ABHILASHA KUMARI, J.

( 1 ) THROUGH this common judgment, we propose to dispose of five First Appeals, namely, First Appeal Nos. 338, 339, 340, 341 and 342 of 2006, all of which. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment" Yes have been filed by the appellant Insurance Company against the common judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Ahmedabad (Rural) dated 20. 9. 2005, in M. A. C. P. Nos. 942, 943, 944, 945 and 946 of 1998. Since these appeals, arise out of the same accident, the factual matrix is the same in all the cases.

( 2 ) IT is stated that the accident took place on 19. 5. 1998 at about 1. 30 P. M. A truck no. GJ-4u-9286 was being driven by its driver on the road going from Vataman cross Road to Dholer. As per the case of the claimants, on the aforesaid date all the deceased persons, namely, Ramubhai Punabhai, Savaben Ramubhai, minor Tiniben, rameshbhai Chaturbhai and minor Vijaykumar Rameshbhai, were going alongwith their goods in the aforesaid truck from Vataman Cross Road to their village buranpur. Due to the rash and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document