SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Guj) 397

RAVI R.TRIPATHI
PRATAPBHAI SURAGBHAI VARU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: PAURAMI SHETH, SHAKTISINH GOHIL

( 1 ) THE petitioner, an agriculturist, a social worker, an ex Member of Legislative Assembly (MLA) " Gujarat in the year 1980, is before this Court being aggrieved of an order passed by the District Magistrate, Amreli dated 04. 11. 2000. The order was confirmed in Appeal under Section 18 of the Arms Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as, "the Act") by the Deputy Secretary, Home Department, Government of Gujarat by order dated 02. 07. 2002.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case leading to the present proceedings are that, the petitioner was holding weapon licences bearing Nos. 7/j for 32 Bore Revolver and 4/j for 38 Bore Stick Gun issued in the year 1976, which were renewed up to 31. 12. 2001. On 05. 09. 1999, a complaint was filed against the petitioner being C. R. No. I 25 of 1999. Respondent No. 2 (the District Magistrate, Amreli) without giving any hearing to the petitioner, suspended the weapon licences of the petitioner till the final disposal of the Criminal Case arising from the aforesaid C. R. No. I 25 of 1999 by order dated 01. 10. 1999. The petitioner was directed to deposit both the weapons in the nearest Police Station. A copy of order dated 01. 10. 1999 is produced at Annexure-









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top