SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Guj) 391

R.S.GARG
GARWARE-WALL ROPES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
ANANT KANOI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.S.NANAVATI, KAMAL TRIVEDI, Nanavati, SAURABH AMIN, Y.J.TRIVEDI

( 1 ) THE applicants, original plaintiffs, M/s. Garware-Wall Ropes Limited, filed Regular Civil Suit No. 2 of 2005 in the Court of the Principal District Judge, Surat, praying, inter alia, that a declaration be granted in favour of the plaintiffs that they are registered owners of the patent; defendant No. 1, M/s. Techfab India, either through its servants, employees, agents, officer, etc. , are not entitled to manufacture, sell, use and offer for sale the `gabion made from synthetic ropes, and also prayed that the defendants are not entitled to do any act, which may infringe the plaintiffs Patented SRG Invention under Patent No. 195352. They have also prayed to the Court that the defendants be restrained by a permanent injunction from manufacturing, selling and/or offering the product known as `gabion , as detailed in Annexure-B. The plaintiffs have also prayed for a sum of Rs. 5 Lakhs as damages with a further prayer for rendition of accounts of profit earned by the defendants by copying the plaintiffs patent and selling the same in the market. In the suit, an application under Exh. 5 was made seeking temporary injunction against defendant No. 1 that they be injuncted from manufa





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top