SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 350

C.K.BUCH
UMEDSINH P. CHAMPAWAT – Appellant
Versus
STAE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.Y.KOGJE, K.B.ANANDJIVALA, SONIA HURA

C. K. BUCH, J.

( 1 ) BY means of filing this petition under section 482 of Crpc, the petitioner accused has prayed for quashing the FIR filed and chargesheet submitted in connection with the offences, registered on 16. 02. 2003 by dcb Police Station being II. CR No. 3003/ 2003 punishable under Sections 3, 4, 5, 7 and 9 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention)Act, 1956 known as The Suppression of immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), It is submitted that the petitioner is totally innocent and is not involved in any of the offences alleged against him in the FIR or the chargesheet directly or indirectly and he is being wrongly prosecuted for the said offences which can be termed as the "offence against society". The petitioner is prosecuted and chargesheeted as the owner of one hotel in the area near Airport of City of Ahmedabad known as Hotel Taj residency Umed.

( 2 ) LD. counsel Mr. Anandjiwala appearing for the petitioner has taken this court through the averments made in the petition and the cause for which the petitioner has been named as an accused in the chargesheet filed by the police. Of course, the FIR as well as the chargesheet have














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top