SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Guj) 345

RAVI R.TRIPATHI
MAKBOOLHUSEN RAZAKMIYA MANIYAR – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF BARODA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.R.MAJMUDAR, M.T.M.HAKIM, N.K.MAJMUDAR, PAURAMI SHETH, PRANAV G.DESAI

( 1 ) THE petitioners are before this Court praying that "para" 18 (B) - "be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction and be pleased to hold that, considering the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interests Act, the petitioners who are borrowers and who had never given the property being Flat No. C/201, Zamzam Apartment, First Floor, Patel Falia, Hathikhana, Fatepura, Baroda, as security to the respondent No. 1, the respondent No. 1 and 2 have no right or authority to take any action under the provisions of the Act and further be pleased to hold that, the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have no right or authority to take possession of the Flat of the petitioners under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interests Act besides, the petitioners have prayed various other reliefs, as Para " 18, the prayer clause, consists of, as many as eight sub-clauses.

( 2 ) IF the petitioners are heard, saying the submissions made in this petition and if the petition is considered for grant of the relief quoted hereinabove or any other relief, its net effect will













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top