2006 Supreme(Guj) 219
D.H.WAGHELA
GUNVANTIBEN DAYARAMBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
Advocates Appeared: A.G.JOSHI, A.J.SHASTRI, A.M.PAREKH, DHAVAL N.VAKIL, JITENDRA MALKAN, KRUTI M.SHAH, M.A.SAPA, PRAFUL B.PATEL, SHAILESH C.SHARMA, Y.V.VAGHELA
( 1 ) RULE. Mr. Jitendra Malkan, learned Assistant solicitor General of India, waives service for the respondent. All these petitions are voicing the same or similar grievance and seeking similar relief of direction to the Regional passport Officer to, in effect, amend the passport so as to incorporate the correct date of birth. There was a limited consensus that detailed examination and narration of facts of each petition was not required and the legal issue involved in the matter was squarely covered by the judgment dated 24. 2. 2006 of this court (Coram: M. R. Shah, J.) in Special Civil application No. 2716 of 2006 and allied matters, wherein important observations, as under, are made:" (7 ). . . . . Therefore, this Court fails to appreciate that why such order of this court requires to be obtained by the petitioner/s herein and/or any of applicant or the person who wants to have necessary correction in the passport in the date of birth and/or the place of birth on the basis of the certificate issued by the competent authority under the provisions of the Births and Deaths registration Act and to obtain the simple order by this Court merely directing the passport authority to loo
Click Here to Read the rest of this document