SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Guj) 201

AKSHAY H.MEHTA
VALIBEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.S.PATEL, KIRAN PANDHAVA, RANJAN B.PATEL, V.M.PANCHOLI

AKSHAY H. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) RULE. Mr. V. M. Pancholi, Ld. APP waives service of rule on behalf of opponents.

( 2 ) THIS application is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure thereinafter referred to as the Cr. P. C. ] to invoke inherent powers of this Court to quash and set aside order passed by the learned Add1. Sessions Judge, Fast Track court No. 2, Vadodara in Criminal revision Application No. 151 of 2002 dated 16th September, 2005, whereby the learned Judge confirmed the order passed by the Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate dated 16th August, 2002 below Exh. 5 in criminal Case No. 1036 of 1999. By the said orders the Courts below have rejected the application submitted by the present applicants for further investigation under section 173 (8) of the Cr. P. C. (1 ). Applicants are original accused of criminal case No. 1036 of 1999 pending on the file of the Ld. Chief Judicial magistrate, Vadodara. It is filed for the alleged commission of offences under sections 498-A, 306 read with Section 114 of the Indian Penal Code [ipc]. It appears that in pursuance of the FIR registered at c. R. No. 55 of 1998 at J P Road Police station, Vadodara on 21st December, 1998, the ap



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top