SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Guj) 682

RAVI R.TRIPATHI
PRAVINBHAI BECHERBHAI VANKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.J.DESAI, SAMIRKHAN PATHAN

( 1 ) PRESENT appeal- Criminal Appeal No. 273 of 2006 was notified with Criminal Misc. Application Application No. 1712 of 2006. The Criminal Misc. Application is filed praying for suspension of conviction. On the earlier occasion, while the Criminal Misc. Application was argued, it transpired that the Criminal Misc. Application is likely to take almost same time which the final hearing of the Criminal Appeal is expected to take and, therefore, at the request of the learned advocate for the appellants-applicants, the Registry was directed to notify the Criminal Appeal for final hearing today.

( 2 ) AT the request of the learned advocate for the appellants, the Criminal Appeal is taken up for final hearing without insisting for supply of paper book, the learned APP has no objection. The record and proceedings of this case is already received, which is perused at the time of hearing of the Criminal Appeal.

( 3 ) THE appellants, three in number, original accused Nos. 4,5 and 6 are before this Court being aggrieved by judgment and order dated 6. 2. 2006 in Special Case No. 130 of 2003 passed by the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Palanpur. The learned Fast Track Court Judge was pl


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top