SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Guj) 673

JAYANT PATEL
MINAXIBEN SHASHIKANTBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
DIST. COLLECTOR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.S.BRAHMBHATT

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The only legal question for consideration is whether probate is a compulsory requirement for establishing rights pursuant to a Will executed by a Hindu for property situated outside the original civil jurisdiction of the High Courts at Calcutta, Madras, and Mumbai. (!) - If a Will falls under clauses other than (a) and (b) of Section 57 of the Indian Succession Act, the restriction requiring probate to establish rights under Section 213 does not operate. (!) - Probate is not required to be obtained by a Hindu in respect of a Will made outside the specified territories or regarding immovable properties situated outside those territories. (!) (!) - Since the property in this case is situated in Gandhinagar, Gujarat, which is outside the original civil jurisdiction of the High Court of Bombay, rights acquired by the legatee can be established before the revenue authority even without probate. (!) - The stand of the District Collector insisting on obtaining probate before making a mutation entry is legally unsustainable and is set aside. (!) - The District Collector is directed to consider the matter for entering mutation based on the Will after following the procedure under Section 135(d) of the Bombay Land Revenue Code if rights are established. (!) - The petition was allowed, and the impugned communication of the District Collector was quashed. (!)

What is the requirement for obtaining probate for a Will executed by a Hindu regarding immovable property situated outside the original civil jurisdiction of the High Courts of Calcutta, Madras, and Bombay?

What are the rights of an executor or legatee to establish rights pursuant to a Will without obtaining probate when the property is located in Gujarat?

How to establish rights under a Will made by a Hindu for property outside the territories specified in Clauses (a) and (b) of Section 57 of the Indian Succession Act without probate?


( 1 ) THE only question, which arise for consideration of this Court in the present petition is whether for a Will executed by a Hindu qua the property situated outside the original civil jurisdiction of the High Court at Calcutta, Madras and Mumbai, the probate is a compulsory requirement for establishing the rights pursuant to the will or not? In the present case, it is an admitted position that property is situated at Gandhinagar and therefore, the incidental question which may be required to be considered by the Court is whether probate for such will is necessary requirement for claiming any right under the said will or not?

( 2 ) THE short facts of the case are that the petitioner is a housewife and her farther-in-law purchased the property in Gandhinagar (Gujarat State) bearing Plot No. 1319/1 at Sector No. 3b admeasuring about 90 Sq. Mtrs. The Registered Sale Deed is also executed by Ilaben Vivekchandra Desai in favour of the father-in-law of the petitioner Chandubhai Jivabhai Patel on 29. 03. 1996. The said document came to be registered vide No. 1160 with the Sub-Registrar, Gandhinagar and consequently, the father-in-law of the petitioner became owner of the property in qu









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top