SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Guj) 645

Gujarat High Court
Judgename :A.M.KAPADIA, K.A.PUJ
SOHANLAL KASIRAM BRAHMIN - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT - Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL 291 Of 2002
Decided On : 10/06/2006

Advocates Appeared: ASHISH M.DAGLI, B.N.KESHVANI, K.P.Raval

Headnote:

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 -Section 17,29 -Appellants-original accused Nos. 1 and 2 through Jail against the judgment and order passed by the learned Additional City Sessions Judge, Court in Sessions Case whereby the appellants were convicted and were ordered to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years and fine of Rs. 1 Lacs and in default thereof, each of the accused to undergo further R. I of two years. prosecution is that P. W. 1 ? J. N. P. I. , attached to the State Narcotic Cell was on duty in the morning, when while he was in the office with PI, he received a secret information to the effect that, two persons of origin one of whom was named and the other being and that, the said Brahmin would be wearing ear rings in his ears and both of whom would be aged about 30-35 years and information was further given to the effect that, both the above referred persons would be passing form Bridge and go to Lake from the road behind the Zoo and that, both of them would be carrying on their person large quantity of narcotic substance Opium. On receipt of such secret information, the same was reduced in writing in a register maintained in this regard and an entry was made on page No. 104 of the said register with regard to the information received. Immediately after making the entry in the said register, report was made to the superior Officer being the Incharge ACP of the Narcotic Cell and such report was forwarded immediately as per the instructions of P. W. 1 –Held present case and in light of the decisions referred to herein above and the principles laid down therein, we are of the opinion that the conviction order passed against the accused Nos. 1 and 2 cannot be sustained. The Appeal, therefore, succeeds. order of the learned Additional City Sessions Judge, Court. passed in Sessions Case convicting the accused Nos. 1 and 2 for offences punishable of the Act and sentencing them to rigorous imprisonment of 10 years and fine of Rs. 1 Lacs each and in default thereof, rigorous imprisonment for two years each for commission of such offence is hereby quashed and set aside. appellant Nos. 1 and 2 ? original accused Nos. 1 and 2 respectively are hereby acquitted from the charges levelled against them. The respondent ? State of Gujarat and the jail authority is hereby directed to release the appellants ? original accused Nos. 1 and 2 from jail forthwith unless their presence is required in connection with any other case. Amount of fine, if paid shall be refunded to them –Ordered Accordingly.

K. A. PUJ, J.

( 1 ) THE present appeal is filed by the appellants-original accused Nos. 1 and 2 through Jail against the judgment and order dated 29. 01. 2002 passed by the learned Additional City Sessions Judge, Court No. 9, Ahmedabad in Sessions Case No. 26 of 2001 whereby the appellants were convicted under Section ? 17 read with Section 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ?the Act?) and were ordered to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years and fine of Rs. 1 Lacs and in default thereof, each of the accused to undergo further R. I of two years.

( 2 ) THE case of the prosecution is that P. W. 1 ? J. N. Parmar, P. I. , attached to the State Narcotic Cell was on duty in the morning on 20. 11. 2000, when while he was in the office with PI Chauhan, he received a secret information to the effect that, two persons of Rajasthani origin one of whom was named Sohanlal and the other being named Ramchandra and that, the said Sohanlal Kasiram Brahmin would be wearing ear rings in his ears and both of whom would be aged about 30-35 years and information was further given to the effect that, both the above referred persons would be passing form Khokhra Bridge and go to Kankaria Lake from the road behind the Kankaria Zoo and that, both of them would be carrying on their person large quantity of narcotic substance Opium. On receipt of such secret information, the same was reduced in writing in a register maintained in this regard and an entry was made on page No. 104 of the said register with regard to the information received. Immediately after making the entry in the said register, report was made to the superior Officer being the Incharge ACP of the Narcotic Cell and such report was forwarded immediately as per the instructions of P. W. 1 ? Mr. Parmar. Subsequent thereto, P. W. 3 ? Mr. Chauhan, Police Constables ? Hirabhai, Natubhai Makwana, Vinodbhai Dantani were instructed to make preparations to carry out a raid and necessary equipment relating thereto such as wax, seal, string, kit box, weighing scale etc. were gathered and subsequent thereto, P. I. Parmar together with all these persons have left Gandhinagar office of the State Narcotic Cell in vehicle bearing Registration No. GJ-1-V-3272 and reached the office of the Superintendent of Police, Incharge of the Narcotic Cell who was on duty in the office of the Economic Offences Cell located at the New Mental Hospital premises and on reaching the said office, police constable Natubhai was instructed to secure the presence of Panch witnesses, and PI Parmar went over to the office of the S. P. , Incharge of State Narcotic Cell and handed over the necessary report containing the information with regard to the raid in question. Subsequent thereto, on the panchas arriving thereat, a search was carried out with regard to the persons of each of the members of the raiding party including the Panch witnesses and nothing incriminating was found upon such search. A preliminary panchnama was drawn between 12. 30 hours and 13. 00 hours and after completion of such preliminary panchnama, all the members of the raiding party including the Panchas left the office of the Economic Offences Cell and reached the scene of the raid via Chamunda Bridge, via Anupam Cinema, via Khokhra Bridge and the police vehicle was parked near the compound wall of the Municipal Garden known as Balvatica. At about 2. 00 p. m. , two persons corresponding to the description provided in the secret information were seen coming from the Khokhra Bridge towards where the members of the raiding party were found located and scattered in watch. The moment the said two persons came near at the electric pole, one of the two persons, in whose hand there appeared to be a bag containing something heavy in weight therein was apprehended by P. I. Parmar, whereas the second person apprehending his arrest attempted to flee from the scene of the incident and he was immediate







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top