SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Guj) 645

A.M.KAPADIA, K.A.PUJ
SOHANLAL KASIRAM BRAHMIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: ASHISH M.DAGLI, B.N.KESHVANI, K.P.Raval

K. A. PUJ, J.

( 1 ) THE present appeal is filed by the appellants-original accused Nos. 1 and 2 through Jail against the judgment and order dated 29. 01. 2002 passed by the learned Additional City Sessions Judge, Court No. 9, Ahmedabad in Sessions Case No. 26 of 2001 whereby the appellants were convicted under Section ? 17 read with Section 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ?the Act?) and were ordered to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years and fine of Rs. 1 Lacs and in default thereof, each of the accused to undergo further R. I of two years.

( 2 ) THE case of the prosecution is that P. W. 1 ? J. N. Parmar, P. I. , attached to the State Narcotic Cell was on duty in the morning on 20. 11. 2000, when while he was in the office with PI Chauhan, he received a secret information to the effect that, two persons of Rajasthani origin one of whom was named Sohanlal and the other being named Ramchandra and that, the said Sohanlal Kasiram Brahmin would be wearing ear rings in his ears and both of whom would be aged about 30-35 years and information was further given to the effect that, both the above referred persons wo







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top