SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Guj) 426

S.R.BRAHMBHATT
BHALABHAI KARSANBHAI DHUMADA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.D.SHAH, I.M.Pandya

S. R. BRAHMBHATT, J.

( 1 ) RULE Shri Pandya learned APP waives service of rule for respondent-State

( 2 ) THE learned Special Judge (ACB), gandhinagar, in his order dated 4 07 2006 has convicted the applicant, original accused no 3 in Special (ACB) Case No 14 of 2001 for commission of offences under Sections 7, 13 (1) (d) and 13 (2) of the Prevention of corruption Act, 1988 The a applicant is sentenced to undergo Rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay fine of Rs 10,000=00, in default thereof, to undergo further Simple imprisonment for a period of two months for commission of the offence under Section 7 of the Corruption Act, 1988 The applicant is also sentenced to undergo Rigorous imprisonment for a of three years and to pay line of Rs 10,000=00, in default thereof, to undergo further simple imprisonment for two months for commission of offences under section 13 (1) (d) read with Section 13 (2) of the prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 The sentences are ordered to run concurrently

( 3 ) BEING aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned conviction order dated 4 07 2006 passed in Special (ACB) Case No 14/2001, the applicant has preferred Criminal appeal No 1233 of















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top