SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Guj) 601

RAVI R.TRIPATHI
PURUSHOTTAMBHAI MULAJIBHAI HADIYAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.J.DESAI, BHAVIN J.SATWARA, HARNISH V.DARJI

( 1 ) THE applicant-original accused is aggrieved by the judgement and order dated 31st January 2003 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Vadhwan City in Criminal Case No. 48 of 2000 whereby the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, was pleased to convict the petitioner-accused for breach of Rule 32 (e) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as ?the said Act?) and under section 7 (2) and 7 (5) under section 16 of the Act. The learned JMFC was pleased to award 3 months simple imprisonment and fine of Rs. 250/-, in default to undergo 15 days of simple imprisonment. The learned JMFC was also pleased to pass a similar order for violation of Rule 32 (f ).

( 2 ) THE petitioner-accused being aggrieved by the aforesaid judgement and order preferred criminal Appeal No. 1 of 2003, which was heard by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 2, Surendranagar. The same was dismissed by judgement and order dated 3rd August 2006. The learned Additional Sessions Judge was pleased to confirm the judgement and order passed by the learned JMFC and was pleased cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner-accused and ordered him to be














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top