SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Guj) 237

D.A.MEHTA
BANK OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
PANKAJ DILIPBHAI HAMNANI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: MAHESH THAKAR, SANDEEP N.BHATT, Umang Oza

D. A. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) IN light of the view that the Court is inclined to take, the petition is taken up for final hearing. RULE. The learned advocates appearing for the respective parties are directed to waive service.

( 2 ) THIS petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs:

"8. On the facts and circumstances mentioned hereinabove, the petitioner prays to Your Lordships that: be pleased to admit the present petition for final disposal at admission stage. Be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash and set aside the impugned judgment and order passed by the District Magistrate, vadodara -respondent No. 3 herein MAG. Vashi No. 776 of 2006 dated 28. 6. 2006 and to pass further order directing respondent no. 3 to pass fresh decision on the application under Section 14 of the Securitisation Act. Pending admission and final disposal of the petition, this Honourable Court may be pleased to direct respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to furnish some securities for dues of the bank before this Hon ble Court which may be deemed fit in the interest of justice and grant appropriate interim relief look











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top