SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Guj) 233

JAYANT PATEL
PRAFUL VASHRAMBHAI – Appellant
Versus
GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: M.D.PANDYA, P.J.YAGNIK

( 1 ) ALL the appeals are for enhancement of the compensation than awarded by the Tribunal as per its judgement and award dated 10. 11. 1987 in Claim Petition Nos. 745 of 1983, 760 of 1983 and 761 of 1983. It may be recorded that Appeal No. 1099 of 1988 is preferred against the award in MACP No. 760 of 1983, whereas Appeal No. 1100 of 1988 is preferred against the award in MACP No. 761 of 1983 and Appeal No. 1101 of 1988 is preferred against award in MACP No. 745 of 1983. As common questions arise for consideration, they are being considered by this common judgement.

( 2 ) THE short facts of the case appear to be that all the claimants ? appellants were traveling in ST Bus bearing registration No. GRR 8136. As per the claimants on 27. 4. 1983 at about 7 a. m. , to 7. 30 a. m. , on the highway running between Fedara to Dhandhuka, the aforesaid ST Bus bound for Gariadhar from Ahmedabad. While proceedings from Fedara to Dhandhuka side, when was passing, one truck bearing Registration No. MBF 993 came from the opposite side with high-speed and the abovesaid bus and the truck collided one another and as a result thereof the bus went off the road on the left side, which resulted into inj










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top