SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Guj) 225

H.K.RATHOD
J. A. CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: Gunvant R.Thakar, SHALIN N.MEHTA, SUNIT SHAH

H. K. RATHOD, J.

( 1 ) HEARD learned Advocate Mr. Shalin N. Mehta for the applicants original petitioners and Mr. Sunit Shah, learned GP with learned AGPs concerned for respondents No. 1, 3 and 4 as well as Mr. Gunvant R. Thakar, learned Advocate for respondent No. 2.

( 2 ) THESE civil applications have been filed by the petitioners for interim relief.

( 3 ) RULE. Service of notice of rule is waived by learned Government Pleader Mr. Shah as well as learned Assistant Government Pleaders concerned for respondents No. 1, 3 and 4 as well as learned Advocate Mr. GR Thakar for respondent No. 2.

( 4 ) PETITIONERS are praying for the following prayers in the main matters as per page 8:

(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order, commanding the respondents herein to permanently absorb the petitioners in service on the posts currently occupied by them; (B) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order commanding the respondents herein to treat the petitioners as State Government servants/employees and to ensure that the petitioners are treated at par in all respe











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top