SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Guj) 261

M.R.SHAH
A. N. PUNIWALA – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: N.K.MAJMUDAR

M. R. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) AS in all the three petitions common question of law and facts arise, they are being disposed of by this common judgment and order. It is required to be noted that all the three petitions were heard by this Court together on 18th April, 2007 and they were adjourned to 25th April, 2007 at the instance of the learned Advocate appearing for the respondent Bank, however, by mistake Special Civil Application Nos. 9275 of 1997 and 9276 of 1997 were adjourned to 2nd May, 2007 and only Special Civil Application No. 9277 of 1997 was notified on Board on 25th April, 2007. Considering the fact that in all the three petitions the common question of law and facts arises and were also heard earlier together, this Court has called for the papers of Special Civil application Nos. 9275 of 1997 and 9276 of 1997 from the Registry, and thus, even the aforesaid two Special Civil Applications are also heard, decided and disposed of together by this common judgment and order.

( 2 ) BY way of all these three Special Civil Applications, the respective petitioners have prayed for an appropriate writ, direction and/or order directing the respondents to pay full pension to the petitioners


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top