( 1 ) LEAVE to delete respondent Nos. 3 and 4 is granted.

( 2 ) RULE. Learned counsels for the respective parlies waive service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondents.

( 3 ) THE present petition has been preferred to ventilate the grievances about misuse of powers vested in Chief Information commissioner, who is Second Appellate authority under the Right to Information act,2005 (hereinafter referred to as "the act. 2005" ).

( 4 ) THE present writ petition has been preferred against the order dated 14th june,2007 passed by Chief Information commissioner while hearing Second appeal No. 730 of 2006-07, in which, order of demolition has been passed by Chief information Commissioner.

( 5 ) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner submitted that respondent No. 5 had applied for getting information under the Act,2005 to Public Information Officer i. e. Talati-cum-Mantri, Village:kheroli, taluka Virpur, District: Kheda i. e. respondent no. 4. His application under Section 6 of the Act. 2005 was dated 4th October,2006. Public Information Officer replied on 3rd november,2006 to the original applicant (present respondent No. 5 ). Being aggrieved by the reply/order of Public