SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Guj) 104

D.A.MEHTA
JAYANTIBHAI DAHYABHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: HARIN P.RAVAL, PRASHANT MANKAD

( 1 ) IN light of the separate order of even date being made in Special Civil Application No. 3273 of 2007 the learned Advocate for the petitioner is permitted to delete petitioner No. 9.

( 2 ) THESE petitions have been preferred praying for following reliefs :

"30. The petitioners, therefore, pray that a) The Hon ble Court be pleased to admit and allow this petition; b) The Hon ble Court be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the order dated 09. 01. 2007 and be further pleased to hold that the action of the respondent No. 2 in purporting to exercise powers under Sec. 74 (D) as well as the order Annexure-B is per-se illegal, unlawful, arbitrary, in breach of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 19 (1) (c) of the Constitution of India and is malafide in law. c) Pending admission, hearing and/or final disposal of this petition, this Hon ble Court be pleased to stay and suspend the operation, implementation and execution of the impugned order Annexure-B dated 09. 01. 2007 and be further pleased to stay and suspend the continued operation of the said order and be pleased to restrain the respondent No. 4 from

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top