SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Guj) 97

H.K.RATHOD
VIJAYKUMAR HARIKISHAN PATHAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: APURVA DAVE, N.K.MAJMUDAR, SUNIT SHAH

H. K. RATHOD, J.

( 1 ) HEARD learned advocate Ms. Moksha Thakkar for learned advocate Mr. N. K. Majmudar appearing on behalf of petitioners and learned Government Pleader mr. Sunit Shah with learned A. G. P. Mr. Dave appearing on behalf of respondents - state Authorities.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the present petitions are that the petitioners are working as Medical Officer Class-II with the respondent. The first and second higher pay scale as per recommendations of Tiku Pay commission available to the petitioners from the initial date of entry in service and also from the continuous officiation, but, respondents have not granted the said benefits from the date of joining in the service. No steps have been taken by the respondents to pay the said benefits to the petitioners. The pay fixation is also not carried out by the respondents. The petitioners are appointed as Medical Officer class-II bonded and they have been confirmed in service on long term basis pursuance to their passing of the GPSC examination, but, benefit of higher pay scale has not been granted from date of initial appointment, but, same has been granted from the date of passing the GPSC examination by the petitioner
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top