SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Guj) 60

P.B.MAJMUDAR
KALPATARU LAND DEVELOPMENT PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
JAMNADAS VISHNUBHAI PATEL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.S.VAKIL, M.T.M.HAKIM, S.N.SHELAT

( 1 ) ADMIT. Mr. S. N. Shelat, learned Senior Counsel waives service of admission on behalf of respondent no. 8.

( 2 ) MR. A. S. VAKIL, learned advocate for the appellant submitted that so far as the present appellant is concerned, he is challenging the order of status quo granted against him and, therefore, it is not necessary to serve other respondents, and he seeks permission to delete the respondents except respondent no. 8 at this stage.

( 3 ) PERMISSION is granted. Names of the respondents, except respondent no. 8, stands deleted from the present proceedings at this stage. With the consent of the parties, this appeal is taken up for final hearing today.

( 4 ) THE appellant herein is the original defendant no. 8 of Special Civil Suit No. 388/2006, pending before Principal Civil Judge (S. D.), Surat. Aforesaid suit is filed by present respondent no. 8 (original plaintiff) against present appellant and other defendants for declaration and permanent injunction. In the aforesaid suit, the plaintiff-respondent no. 8 herein, gave an application at Exh. 5 for interim injunction with a prayer that during the pendency of the suit the defendants may be restrained from disturbing the pos











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top