SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Guj) 35

A.M.KAPADIA, K.A.PUJ
MANOJBHAI LALJIBHAI KABARIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.D.SHAH, K.T.DAVE

A. M. KAPADIA, J.

( 1 ) THESE two Criminal Appeals under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ( the Code for short) are directed against the judgment and order dated 26. 2. 2002 rendered in Sessions Case No. 283 of 1999 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 22, City Sessions Court, Ahmedabad by which the appellants (A-1, A-2, A-3 and A-5) of both these appeals have been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 304-B and under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code ( ipc for short) and under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 ( the Act for short) and sentenced to suffer R. I. for ten years for the offence under Section 304-B IPC, R. I. for two years and fine of Rs. 500/- i. d. , to undergo R. I. for a further period of 15 days for the offence under Section 498-A IPC and R. I. for six months and fine of Rs. 500/- i. d. , to undergo R. I. for a further period of 15 days for the offence under Section 4 of the Act. It is also ordered that all the sentences imposed on A-1, A-2, A-3 and A-5 shall run concurrently. The order further stipulates that A-4 has been given benefit of doubt and has been acquitted of the offences with which she was char





































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top