SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Guj) 21

AKIL KURESHI, M.S.SHAH
HARSHVARDHAN B. PATEL – Appellant
Versus
VITTHALBHAI A PATEL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: MTM HAKIM, P.V.Nanavati, VIBHUTI NANAVATI

M. S. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is directed against the judgement and award dated 30th September, 2004 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), FTC, Bharuch in M. A. C. P. No. 687/1996 preferred under Section 163a of the said Act, for enhancement of compensation amount on account of the injuries sustained by the appellant claimant in a motor vehicle accident resulting into permanent partial disablement.

( 2 ) THE appellant was at the relevant time employed as a driver of the Jeep insured by the respondent no. 2- United India Insurance Co. When the appellant was driving the Jeep from Jambusar to Navagam, Rajkot, a truck insured by respondent no. 4- the Oriental Insurance Co. was proceeding in the same direction ahead of the Jeep. Driver of the truck suddenly applied the brake and the appellant also applied the brake to stop the Jeep. In the process, the Jeep dashed with the truck on the rear side and the appellant sustained serious injuries. The appellant was taken to the Civil Hospital at Chotila and thereafter, to the Civil Hospital at Rajkot where he was admitted as an indoor patient. Plaster was applied on his right











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top