SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Guj) 449

R.M.DOSHIT
MAHMAD AHMADBHAI – Appellant
Versus
FATMABEN ABDULLA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: EJAZ QURESHI, N.K.MAJMUDAR, S.D.SUTHAR, SHAKEEL.A.QURESHI

( 1 ) THIS Appeal under Section 100 CPC has been preferred by the defendant no. 3 in Special Civil Suit No. 57/2004 against the judgment and order dated 10th April, 2007 passed by the learned Additional District Judge and Fast Track Judge, Junagadh in Regular Civil Appeal No. 107/2006.

( 2 ) THE Appeal has been admitted on the following substantial questions of law :

" (1) Whether the lower appellate Court has materially erred in law in not considering the contentions raised before it on merits and in dealing with the appeal perfunctorily and in dismissing the same without assigning any reason except that "the learned trial Judge has not committed any error in passing the judgment and decree. " (2) Whether the lower appellate Court has materially erred in law in not determining the extent of share of each of the parties to the suit in the suit property and in simply holding that each branch of the sharers shall have one-half share in the suit property. "

( 3 ) WITH the consent of the learned advocates, the Appeal is heard and disposed of today.

( 4 ) THE respondents nos. 1 to 6, the plaintiffs, instituted Special Civil Suit No. 57/2004 in the Court of learned Civil Judge (S. D.), Ju





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top