SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Guj) 354

K.M.MEHTA
JAKIR ISHAKBHAI NAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: Chetnaben Joshi, N.N.Prajapati

K. M. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) JAKIR Ishakbhai Nat, applicant-original accused has filed this application under section 389 (1) of the Criminal Procedure code for suspension of sentence imposed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, fast Track Court No. 4, Surat in Sessions case No. 66 of 2004 vide judgment and order dated 27/12/2004.

( 2 ) HEARD Mr. N. N. Prajapati, learned advocate for the applicant-original accused. He has stated that the learned Judge by impugned judgment, has convicted the accused under Sections 363 (punishment for kidnapping), 366 (kidnapping, abducting or inducing woman to compel her marriage etc.) and 376 (punishment for rape) of the indian Penal Code for three years and for seven years respectively. The accused is in jail since 27/12/2004. Prior to that also for about ten months, he was in jail. So on that aspect he has prayed for suspension of the sentence in this behalf. For the same, the learned advocate has relied upon the division Bench judgment of this Court (Coram:r. P. Dholakia and H. N. Devani, J. J.)in the case of Asgarali Onali Lokhandwala and another v. The State of Gujarat dated 11/5/2007 in Criminal Misc. Application no. 2755 of 2007 in Criminal Ap










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top