SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Guj) 320

H.B.ANTANI, M.S.SHAH
BASHIR ADAMJI ADAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: M.M.Saiyed, N.V.ANJARIA, Trusha Patel, V.C.Vaghela

M. S. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) LEAVE to add Siraj Mohammad Patel as respondent No. 5. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. Anjaria for the State Election Commission (respondent No. 4), Ms. Trusha Patel, learned A. G. P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Mr. Vaghela for mr. Siraj Mohammad Patel (who is permitted to be joined as respondent No. 5 and who is one of the contesting candidates) waive service of Rule for the respective parties.

( 2 ) ELECTIONS to Sanjali Gram Panchayat were required to be held before 17-1-2007. The elections were not held, and therefore, this Court had to issue a writ of mandamus following the decision of the Apex Court in Kishansing tomar v. Municipal Corporation of the City of Ahmedabad, AIR 2007 SC 269 : 2007 (1) GLR 332 (SC ). By our order dated 11-5-2007, we directed the authorities to hold elections to Sanjali Gram Panchayat at the earliest and in any case before 30-6-2007. We allowed the petition in terms of the following directions :

"3. In view of the aforesaid decision, we direct the respondents to hold elections to Sanjali Gram Panchayat, Ankleshwar Taluka, Bharuch District at the earliest and in any case before 30-6-2007. In the meantime, the authorities shall co





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top