SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Guj) 189

R.S.GARG
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
JAGUBHAI BHANABHAI PATEL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: KETTY A.MEHTA, R.C.KODEKAR, SAURABH AMIN

( 1 ) MR. R. C. Kodekar, learned Assistant Government Pleader, for the petitioner, Mrs. Ketty A. Mehta, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. Saurabh Amin, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 are heard.

( 2 ) BEFORE I refer to the facts of the case, I must record that present is a case, where, Mrs. Ketty A. Mehta, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. Saurabh Amin learned counsel for the respondent No. 2, tried their best to mislead this Court by making false statements and misstatements in the Court. With bruised feeling and bleeding heart, I am required to record all what had taken place in the court in presence of Mr. A. J. Patel, Mr. Shital R. Patel, Mr. Dhirendra Mehta, Ms. Neesha Parikh, Dr. Amee Yajnik, learned counsel and each person was listening that how these two advocates, despite repeated warning from the Court, were making false misleading statements to obtain favourable orders.

( 3 ) TO start, I asked Mr. Amin that whether the order dtd. 29/4/1992 (Annexure-B) passed by the Deputy Collector confiscating 17 Acres land in view of the breach of the terms of the allotment order, was ever challenged by the respondent No. 2, Mr. Amin said in the








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top