SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Guj) 171

R.S.GARG
RADHIBEN WD/O. CHETIA MAVJI KATARA – Appellant
Versus
SURTAN VESTA DAMOR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.F.Amin, HUKAM SINGH, R.M.VIN

R. S. GARG, J.

( 1 ) MR. D. F. Amin, learned counsel for the cippellants, Mr. R. M. Vin, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 and mr. Hukum Singh, learned Assistant government Pleader for the respondent no. 2 - State.

( 2 ) SHORT facts necessary for disposal of the present appeal are that one Chetiabhai mavjibhai Katara - husband of the plaintiff no. 1 and father of the plaintifff No. 2 to 4 was the owner of the suit land bearing survey No. 51 admeasuring 13 Acres and 2 gunthas and was cultivating the same.

( 3 ) THE said Chetiabhai Mavjibhai Katara expired in the year 1951 and thereafter, the plaintiffs became owners of the suit land. The plaintiffs say that their names were recorded in the revenue records vide mutation Entry No. 35. The defendant No. 1, who were residing at village Varoda, somehow or other, managed an entry in his favour that he had purchased the property by paying a consideration of Rs. 300=00 (Rupees Three Hundred only) and the sale was oral. After realising about the entry, the plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration that the said entry be held to be invalid and not affecting the rights of the plaintiffs. The defendant No. 1 appeared before the Court and r












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top