R.S.GARG
RADHIBEN WD/O. CHETIA MAVJI KATARA – Appellant
Versus
SURTAN VESTA DAMOR – Respondent
( 1 ) MR. D. F. Amin, learned counsel for the cippellants, Mr. R. M. Vin, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 and mr. Hukum Singh, learned Assistant government Pleader for the respondent no. 2 - State.
( 2 ) SHORT facts necessary for disposal of the present appeal are that one Chetiabhai mavjibhai Katara - husband of the plaintiff no. 1 and father of the plaintifff No. 2 to 4 was the owner of the suit land bearing survey No. 51 admeasuring 13 Acres and 2 gunthas and was cultivating the same.
( 3 ) THE said Chetiabhai Mavjibhai Katara expired in the year 1951 and thereafter, the plaintiffs became owners of the suit land. The plaintiffs say that their names were recorded in the revenue records vide mutation Entry No. 35. The defendant No. 1, who were residing at village Varoda, somehow or other, managed an entry in his favour that he had purchased the property by paying a consideration of Rs. 300=00 (Rupees Three Hundred only) and the sale was oral. After realising about the entry, the plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration that the said entry be held to be invalid and not affecting the rights of the plaintiffs. The defendant No. 1 appeared before the Court and r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.