SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Guj) 168

K.S.JHAVERI
RASIKLAL DALPATRAM THAKKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: AVANI S.MEHTA, I.H.SYED, K.G.VAKHARIA, P.D.BHATE

K. S. JHAVERI, J.

( 1 ) WHILE issuing Notice on 22. 12. 2006, this Court had stayed the further investigation with respect to the impugned complaints till the returnable date and the same was extended from time to time. Today, when the matter was called out, Mr.. H. Syed learned Advocate for the petitioner produced on record Draft amendment in each of the petitions praying to amend the Prayer Clause by incorporating the following Paragraph in each of the petitions;

"14 (BBB) : This Hon ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari, or any other Writ, order, direction to quash and set aside the Enquiry Case No. 21 of 2003 filed before the learned Chief Metropolitan magistrate, Ahmedabad and further be pleased to quash and set aside the order directing investigation uls. 156 (3) of the cr. P. C. by the learned Chief Metropolitan magistrate in the Enquiry Case No. 21 of 2003 and be pleased to quash and set aside the proceedings arising out of the same".

1]. Looking to the relief which is sought by way of Draft Amendment, it would be relevant to refer to the reliefs claimed in these petitions, which read as under; "a. Your Lordship be pleased to allow the present petition and furt


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top