SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Guj) 702

ABHILASHA KUMARI
ASHOKKUAMR BHAVSANGBHAI CHAUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPALITIES – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.J.SHASTRI, PATHIK ACHARYA, PRAKASH K.JANI

( 1 ) THE present Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, raises an important question of law, namely, whether the petitioner, who is the President of the Mehsana Nagarpalika, ("nagarpalika" for short) incurred the disqualification under Section 11 (1) (h) of the Gujarat Municipalities Act 1963 ("the Act" for short), for having more than two children, after his election to the said post.

( 2 ) IN order to adjudicate upon this issue, it will be useful to set out the brief facts of the case. As stated in the petition, the petitioner filed his nomination form to be elected as a member (councillor) of the Mehsana Nagarpalika from Ward No. 9. The general elections of Mehsana Nagarpalika took place on 11. 12. 2005. The petitioner was declared elected as a councillor on 13. 12. 2005. After his election as a councillor, a meeting of the elected councillors of the Nagarpalika was held on 25. 12. 2005, for the purpose of electing the President and Vice President of the Nagarpalika. In the election which took place during the said meeting, held on 25. 12. 2005, the petitioner came to be elected as President of the Nagarpalika and began to function as such. As per


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top