ABHILASHA KUMARI
ASHOKKUAMR BHAVSANGBHAI CHAUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPALITIES – Respondent
( 2 ) IN order to adjudicate upon this issue, it will be useful to set out the brief facts of the case. As stated in the petition, the petitioner filed his nomination form to be elected as a member (councillor) of the Mehsana Nagarpalika from Ward No. 9. The general elections of Mehsana Nagarpalika took place on 11. 12. 2005. The petitioner was declared elected as a councillor on 13. 12. 2005. After his election as a councillor, a meeting of the elected councillors of the Nagarpalika was held on 25. 12. 2005, for the purpose of electing the President and Vice President of the Nagarpalika. In the election which took place during the said meeting, held on 25. 12. 2005, the petitioner came to be elected as President of the Nagarpalika and began to function as such. As per
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.