SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Guj) 660

C.K.BUCH
REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES – Appellant
Versus
SHASHI THEATRES PVT. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.C.SEJPAL, HETVI SANCHETI, P.D.BHATE, S.V.RAJU

( 1 ) BY way of both these Revision Applications, the petitioner has challenged the judgment and order dated 22nd September 1983 passed by the learned Additional City Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad in Criminal Revision Application No. 230 of 1983, reversing the order dated 18th July 1983 passed in Criminal Case No. 1743 of 1982 by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Ahmedabad, rejecting the application preferred by the accused citing the provisions of Section 468 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Code ).

( 2 ) CRIMINAL Revision Application No. 1242 of 1983 has been preferred by (i) Registrar of Companies and (ii) State of Gujarat, and the subsequent Revision Application i. e. Criminal Revision Application No. 17 of 1984, has been preferred only by the Registrar of Companies and the State of Gujarat is joined as one of the respondents i. e. respondent no. 6 in the said Revision Application. The original prosecution was against the respondent-accused persons whose names are shown as respondent nos. 1 to 5 in both the Revision Applications. But ultimately, the said application came to be decided by the learned Magistrate on 18th July 1983.

( 3 )



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top