SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Guj) 594

M.R.SHAH
MAHENDRAKUMAR TULSIBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: MENGDE, V.M.PANCHOLI

( 1 ) AS common question of law and facts arise in this group of applications, they are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.

( 2 ) CRIMINAL Misc. Application No. 177 of 2007 is filed by the applicant " original accused No. 2 to quash and set aside the complaint being criminal case No. 2210 of 2005 pending before the learned JMFC, 4th Court, Vadodara qua the applicant.

( 3 ) CRIMINAL Misc. Application No. 178 of 2007 is filed by the applicant " original accused No. 2 to quash and set aside the complaint being criminal case No. 2211 of 2005 pending before the learned JMFC, 4th Court, Vadodara qua the applicant.

( 4 ) CRIMINAL Misc. Application No. 179 of 2007 is filed by the applicant " original accused No. 2 to quash and set aside the complaint being criminal case No. 2212 of 2005 pending before the learned JMFC, 4th Court, Vadodara qua the applicant.

( 5 ) CRIMINAL Misc. Application No. 181 of 2007 is filed by the applicant " original accused No. 2 to quash and set aside the complaint being criminal case No. 2213 of 2005 pending before the learned JMFC, 4th Court, Vadodara qua the applicant.

( 6 ) AFORESAID four complaints " criminal cases are filed by the responden

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top