Jayant Patel, J.—As in all the petitions, common question arise for consideration, they are being considered by this common Judgement.

2. Leave to delete Sardar Patel University as party respondents since in any case, the presence of the University may not be required for deciding the controversy raised in the present petitions.

3. I have heard Mr. Yagnik, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Sunit Shah, for respondent No.1, Mr. Dave for Respondents Nos. 2 & 3 and Mrs.Nanavati for respondent No.6 for final disposal.

4. The short facts of the case appears to be that the petitioners who are students of Pramukhswami Medical College, respondent No.2 herein, being run by respondent No.3, have approached to this Court challenging the action of the respondent No.1 Committee for fixation of the fee structure for the course of MBBS.

5. It appears that for the academic year of 2003-2004 to 2005-2006, initially, the fee approved by the Fees Committee was of Rs. 1.45 Lakhs. The respondent Nos. 2 & 3 (hereinafter referred to as “the college/institution”) had challenged the said decision of the Fee Committee before this Court and this Court had not interfered with the said decision. The