D.N.PATEL
JIGAR MAYURBHAI SHAH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
Rule. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent State.
2. The present application has been filed mainly under sub-section (6) of section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for bail in connection with the offence bearing Cr. No. I-4 of 2006 registered with DCB crime branch police station, Ahmedabad for the offences punishable under sections 420, 465, 468, 471, 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code, sections 3 and 6 of the Indian Wireless Telegraph Act and section 65 of the Information Technology Act, as the trial has not been competed after fixing the date of taking evidence of witnesses.
3. Thrice the matter is called out in three different rounds of calling. The learned advocate for the applicant is absent on all the three occasions. Neither the matter is mentioned nor the learned advocate for the applicant is present. Hence, I have heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
4. Having heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and looking to the facts of the case, it appears that this application is filed mainly under sub-section (6) of section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedur
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.