SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Guj) 73

J.R.VORA, M.R.SHAH
TEJUMAL DAYALDAS MULANI (SINDHI) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
MR SAMIR J DAVE for Appellant
MR AJ DESAI APP for Respondent

JUDGMENT :

1 Instant Appeal is preferred by the appellant under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment and order rendered by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 16, Ahmedabad City, on 19th of January, 2006, in Sessions Case No. 144 of 2002 against his conviction and sentence. Including present appellant, in the said Sessions Case, in all there were three accused and accused Nos. 2 and 3 came to be acquitted by the Trial Court for all the charges levelled against them, while present appellant - accused No.1 came to be convicted by the Trial Court for the offences punishable under Sections 304-B, 306 and 498-A of the Indian Penal Code. Appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of 8 years for the offence proved against him under Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code; rigorous imprisonment of five years and to pay fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment of one year for the offence proved against him under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code and rigorous imprisonment of two years and to pay fine of Rs. 2,000, in default to undergo simple imprisonment of six months for the offence proved against him under Section 498-A o












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top