SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Guj) 33

Gujarat High Court
P. N. BHAGWATI,N. K. VAKIL
Doongarsee and Sons - Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat - Respondent
Special Civil Applns. Nos. 564 of 1962, 1100 of 1963, 1441 of 1966 and 218 of 1968
Decided On : 04/25/1969

Advocates:
V.S. Parikh and S.B. Vakil, for Petitioner respectively in Nos. 564 of
1962 and 218 of 1968; S.B. Vakil, for Petitioner in No. 1100 of 1963; A.H. Mehta, for Petitioner in No. 1441 of 1966; J.M. Thakore, Advocate General with Addl. Govt. Pleader, for Respondents Nos. 1 and 2 in all the Petns. M.C. Nanavati, for Respondent No. 3 in all the Petns. Attorney General served in No. 564 of 1962.

Headnote:

Co-operative Societies Act, 1925 - Section 4 – Notification - Acquisition of Land – Public Purpose - State Government to acquire the petitioners lands for construction of houses by its members and the State Government -Notification has been cancelled by Government - - Held, Government is bound to make a Section 6 without unreasonable delay issue of section 4 notification rests on a proper interpretation of sections 4, 5A and 6 in the context of the scheme Act - But this question is no longer open to doubt or debate at least so far as this Court is concerned - Court have held in our judgment delivered that declaration be valid must follow within a reasonable time issue notification - It therefore remains to consider whether time that elapsed between Section 4 notification second section 6 notification could be regarded as reasonable facts and circumstances present case - Notification Section 4 was issued second section 6 notification and there was thus an interval of about five years between the two notifications. We do not think this interval of time could be regarded as reasonable. was issued holding requisite inquiry and considering report Collector - This notification was clearly valid - and indeed as pointed out above this position was not disputed by Advocate General on behalf State - petitions allowed

Judgement

BHAGWATI, C. J. :- The petitioners are owners of different pieces of land forming one compact block situate at village Vasana, City Taluka, Ahmedabad District. The third respondent society is a co-operative housing society formed with the object of enabling its members to construct houses and registered under the Bombay Co-operative Societies Act, 1925 - now deemed to be registered under the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961. The petitioners' lands being well situate, the third respondent society moved the State Government to acquire the petitioners' lands for construction of houses by its members and the State Government accordingly issued a notification dated 20th May, 1961 under Section 4 stating inter alia that the petitioners' lands were likely to be needed for a public purpose, namely, for construction of houses for members of Shri Yogeshwar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Within thirty days of the issue of this notification some of the petitioners filed their objections against the proposed acquisition of their lands and the Collector after holding an inquiry made his report to the State Government under Section 5-A, sub-section (2). The petitioners who are owners of survey Nos. 7, 8, 14 and 17, apprehending that the State Government will immediately proceed to issue a notification under Section 6 in respect of their lands thereupon filed Special Civil Application No. 564 of 1962 challenging the power of the State Government to acquire for construction of houses for members of a co-operative housing society and seeking to restrain the State Government from proceeding further under the notification dated 20th May, 1961. On the petition being admitted an interim injunction was sought but it was refused and the State Government after considering the report of the Collector under Section 5-A, sub-section (2), issued a notification dated 29th April, 1963 under Section 6 which in so far as is material was in the following terms :

"......Whereas the Government of Gujarat is satisfied ...... that the said lands are needed to be acquired at the public expense for the public purpose specified in column 4 of the Schedule hereto.

It is hereby declared under the provisions of Section 6 of the said Act that the lands are required for the public purpose specified in Column 4 of the Schedule hereto."

The public purpose specified in column 4 was "for a Housing Scheme undertaken by Shri Yogeshwarnagar Co-operative Housing Society Limited, Ahmedabad, with the sanction of the Government." Though this statement of the public purpose in the notification dated 29th April, 1963 was worded slightly differently from that contained in the notification dated 20th May, 1961, the case of the respondents was that there was no difference in substance as the housing scheme referred to in the notification dated 29th April, 1963 was a housing scheme for the members of the third respondent society and not for the public. It may be stated here that prior to the issue of the notification dated 29th April, 1963, a resolution dated 21st December, 1962 was passed by the Government sanctioning a nominal contribution of Re. 1/- towards the cost of acquisition and that is why the recital in the said notification stated that "......... the said lands are needed to be acquired at the public expense". Notices under Section 9, sub-section (1) were thereafter served on the petitioners and the Special Land Acquisition Officer after holding the requisite inquiry made an award dated 21st December, 1963 determining the amount of compensation payable to the petitioners in each of these petitions. Possession of the respective lands was then demanded by the Government from the petitioners. The petitioners who are owners of Survey Nos. 7 to 9, 12 to 17 and 19 to 22 thereupon preferred Special Civil Application No. 1100 of 1963 challenging the validity of the notification dated 29th April, 1963. Nothing transpired thereafter until 15th April, 1966 when the Gover























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top