SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Guj) 74

V.B.RAJU
Lalluram Mohanlal – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
N.S. Parghi, for Appellant; B.R. Sompura, Asst. Govt. Pleader., for The State.

JUDGMENT :-When a property is not proved to be stolen, it cannot be confiscated and must be returned to the person from whose possession it was taken. The order of confiscation in the present case is, therefore, set aside and it is ordered that the property should be returned to the person from whose possession it was taken by the police.
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top