SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Guj) 57

Gujarat High Court
P. N. BHAGWATI,J. B. MEHTA
Kadi Municipality - Appellant
Versus
New Chhotalal Mills Co., Ltd., Kadi - Respondent
Letters Patent Appeals Nos. 8, 9 and 10 of 1961
Decided On : 07/27/1964

Advocates:
S. N. Patel, for Appellant (in all the appeals); B. G. Thakore, for Respondent (in all the appeals).

Headnote:

Extra-Provincial Jurisdiction Act, 1947 - Octroi duty - Public auction- Octroi duty has been claimed by the Kadi Municipality- and paid by the New Chhotalal Mills Company Limited- trial Judge before whom the suit came to be tried took the view that the exemption granted under the Tharav continued to be in force, even after the merger of Baroda State and that the order dated 14th July 1953 in so far as it purported to withdraw that exemption was invalid and that the Company was, therefore, entitled to exemption from payment of octroi duty in excess of Rs. 300/- per year for a period of twenty years, as provided in the Tharav – Held, Suit to enforce a liability of the Municipality can be filed against the Municipality even during the period of supersession. As a matter of fact if the view were taken that the Municipality is extinguished as a result of the order of supersession a highly anomalous result would arise. Since the liabilities of the Municipality are not transferred to the State Government like the property of the Municipality, the liabilities would come to an end along with the Municipality and the persons having corresponding rights would be left high and dry. The Officers and employees of the Municipality would also be without a master since-the Municipality would be no longer in existence. Difficulties would also arise when the Municipality is re-established. According to this submission the Municipality when re-established would be a new corporate entity and there being no provision for transfer of liabilities, the liabilities of the old Municipality would not be enforceable against the new Municipality and the officers and employees would also have to be re-employed by the new Municipality. These considerations fortify us in the view which we are inclined to take on a plain grammatical construction of the words used by the Legislature. We, therefore, agree with the learned Judge that the suit was maintainable against the Municipality – Appeal dismsised

Judgement

BHAGWATI, J. :- These three appeals involve common questions of law and the facts in all the three appeals are also similar barring difference only in the period in respect of which octroi duty has been claimed by the Kadi Municipality (hereinafter referred to as the Municipality) and paid by the New Chhotalal Mills Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Company) and the amount of such octroi duty and it would therefore be sufficient if only the facts of the first appeal are set out in full and a mere reference to the period and amount of octroi duty is made in so far as the second and third appeals are concerned. The history of the facts relevant for the purpose of these appeals dates back to 24th June 1933 when the Company purchased a Textile Mill from the Liquidator of the Laxmi Cotton Mills Company Limited at a public auction held by the District Judge, Mehsana. The Textile Mill was situate in Kadi comprised within the territories of the former State of Baroda. After purchasing the Textile Mill the Company started running it from June 1934. It appears that around this time the Company made an application to the Baroda Government for exemption from certain taxes and duties and the Baroda Government by a Tharav dated 16th April 1935 granted those exemptions to the Company. We shall have occasion to examine the true nature and character of this Tharav a little later but it is sufficient to state for the present that one of the exemptions granted by the Tharav was and that is the exemption with which wears primarily concerned in these appeals from octroi duty leviable by the Municipality in respect of goods which might be brought within the mill premises by the Company. The exemption was not a total exemption but was a partial one in that octroi duty was exempted only to the extent to which it exceeded Rs. 300/-. The period for which the exemption was granted was twenty years. It appears that at the date when the Tharav was passed, the mill premises were not within the limits of the Municipality and there was accordingly no octroi duty payable by the Company in respect of goods which might be brought by it within the mill premises. On 11th February 1937, however, a notification was issued by the appropriate authority under the B Class Municipalities Act, being Act No. 32 of Samvat 1983, by which the Municipality was governed extending the limits of the Municipality so as to include within those limits the land on which the mill was situate. The mill premises having been brought within the limits of the Municipality, the Company became liable to pay octroi duty to the Municipality in respect of goods brought by it within the mil! premises. In view, however, of the exemption granted to the Company, the liability of the Company to pay octroi duty to the Municipality was limited to Rs. 300/- per year and the Company accordingly did not pay any amount exceeding Rs. 300/- per year as and by way of octroi duty to the Municipality. In 1939 the B Class Municipalities Act, being Act No. 32 of Samvat 1983 was repealed and substituted by the B Class Municipalities Act, being Act No. 14 of 1949, but the exemption granted to the 'Company continue and the Company continued to pay not more than Rs. 300/- per year in respect of octroi duty to the Municipality. This state of affairs continued right upto 1st May 1949 when the Ruler of Baroda State ceded full and exclusive authority, jurisdiction and powers for and in relation to the governance of the Baroda State to the Government of India under a merger agreement entered into between him and the Government of India. The territories of the Baroda State were thereafter governed by the Government of Bombay in virtue of the power delegated to it by the Central Government under S. 3(2) of the Extra-Provincial Jurisdiction Act, 1947, until the passing of the States Merger (Governors' Provinces) Order, 1949, by which the territories of the Baroda State became part of the territories





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top