R.M.DOSHIT, K.M.THAKER
HIMMATBHAI RAMJIBHAI – Appellant
Versus
SECOND SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, AHMEDABAD – Respondent
MISS R. M. DOSHIT, J. Heard the learned Advocates.
2. With the consent of the learned Advocates, the petition is heard and decided finally.
3. This petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution is filed by the land owners. It is the claim of the petitioners that their lands at village Khambhada, Taluka-Dhandhuka, District-Ahmedabad were acquired in the year 1980 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as, 'the Act') for construction of Patana-Sarangpur road. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the compensation offered by the State Government, the petitioners had applied for reference under Sec. 18 of the Act. The learned Assistant Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) decided the said reference on 30th December, 1985. The learned Extra-Assistant Judge enhanced the compensation to Rs. 9/- per sq.mt., with 30% solatium and interest @ 9% per annum for the first year and @ 12% per annum for the remaining period till the amount of compensation was paid or deposited in the Court.
4. The learned Assistant Judge though had enhanced the amount of compensation and also ordered payment of interest @ 12% per annum, did not extend the benefit of interest at the rate of 15% as sp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.