AKIL KURESHI
Samar Nath – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
Akil Kureshi, J.—The petitioner is the original accused. He seeks quashing of Criminal Case No. 1182/2009 (here-in-after referred to as ‘the said complaint’) pending before the learned JMFC, Sanand.
2. Briefly stated facts are as follows :
2.1 Petitioner is the original accused No. 1 in said complaint lodged by Respondent No. 2 herein. Briefly stated allegations in the complaint are that Respondent No. 2 is a manufacturer of cotton products. It sells goods mostly through exports. One of the customers of the complainant is one America based company called Mervyns L.L.C. (here-in-after referred to as ‘the purchaser company’). The purchaser company places purchase order with the complainant company. As per the purchase order complainant company entrusts transport of such export consignment to APL Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. at Mumbai. It may be noted that the petitioner is Managing Director of said APL Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. Such consignment is transported to its destination in USA by APL Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. through the vessels of Orient Oversees Container Line (India) Pvt. Ltd. (‘OOCL’ for short) of which original accused No. 2 is stated to be the Managing Director
State of Gujarat vs. Jaswantlal Nathalal AIR 1968 SC 700
Velji Raghvaji Patel vs. State of Maharashtra 1965 (2) SCR 429 = AIR 1965 SC 1433
Keki Hormusji Gharda and Others vs. Mehervan Rustom Irani and Another
Saroj Kumar Poddar vs. State (NCT of Delhi) and Another
Sabitha Ramamurthy and Anr. vs. R.B.S. Channabasavaradhya (2006) 10 SCC 581.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.