SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Guj) 256

2010 (3) GCD 2295 (Guj) (DB)
Hon’ble Mr. Chief Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya &
Hon’ble Mr. Justice K.M. Thaker
Bipin Prataprai Bhatt & Ors.
Versus
Union of India & Ors.
Special Civil Application No. 7858 of 2010—Decided on 23/08/2010

Appearance :
Mr. Asim Pandya for H.L. Patel, Advocates for the Petitioners No. 1 - 5.
None, for the Respondents No. 1, 3.
Ms. Krina Calla, AGP for the Respondent No. 2.

Point in Issue :
Whether provision under Section 26(1) of the Act is ultra vires of Article 20(1) of Constitution.

Headnote:Head Note :

       Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 20(1) — Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 — Section 26(1) — Constitution validity of the provision — Under the Act person aggrieved can ask for relief in other suits and legal proceedings as available under Sections 18 to 21 of the Act — Therefore, petitioner can not derive the advantage of Article 20(1) of Constitution to challenge the validity of Section 26(1) of the Act.

       Held :

       As it will be evident that Sections 18 to 22 of the Domestic Violence Act relate to relief, which can be sought for even from civil Court and they are civil in nature, the petitioner cannot derive the advantage of Article 20(1) of the Constitution to challenge the validity of Section 26 of the Domestic Violence Act. [Para 11]

       Law Laid Down :

       As the relief under the provision is civil in nature and can be sought from civil Court it can not be held ultra vires of Article 20 of the Constitution.

       

Judgment

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, CJ.—The petitioner has challenged the proceeding in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 552 of 2009 initiated under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Domestic Violence Act’) and prayed to declare Section 26(1) of the Act ultra vires of Article 20 of the Constitution of India.

2. On hearing the counsel for the petitioner, as no prima facie case was found to have been made out, no separate notice was issued on the respondents or learned Advocate General.

3. 1st petitioner - Bipin Prataprai Bhatt (husband) married with the 3rd respondent - Kiranben Bipinbhai Bhatt (wife). 2nd and 5th petitioners are in-laws of 3rd respondent. The marriage took place on 04.06.1998, but the same did not proceed smooth.

4. According to petitioners, the 1st petitioner has already taken divorce from the 3rd respondent by an agreement dated 06.12.1999 and thereafter he has married to one Meena on 17.01.2000, who is the sister of 3rd respondent (wife).

5. It appears that a proceeding under Section 125 was filed by the wife for maintenance, wherein the J.M.F.C., Gandhinagar, by order dated 19.01.2004, awarded maintenance of Rs. 500/- p.m. with effect from September 2000 and a sum of Rs. 700/- p.m. with effect from October 2001. The same was enhanced at the instance of the wife to Rs. 3,000/- p.m.

6. It further appears that a criminal case has been lodged by 3rd respondent (wife) against the 1st petitioner (husband) and his second wife Meena (2nd petitioner herein) for offences punishable under Sections 494, 497, 498, 465, 471 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code. The same is pending. Another Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 552 of 2009 has been filed by wife - 3rd respondent under the provisions of Domestic Violence Act. The petitioner filed petition under Section 482 of the CrPC in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 10577 of 2009 for quashing the same, but having not granted any relief, the same was withdrawn and thereafter same very proceeding has been filed under the writ jurisdiction of this Court while challenging the constitutional validity of Section 26(1) of the Domestic Violence Act.

7. The only plea taken by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the offence having taken place between the year 1999 and 2004 much prior to enactment of the Domestic Violence Act, initiation of proceeding under Section 26(1) is bad and it is violative of Article 20(1) of the Constitution of India. He would contend that there being a specific prohibition under Section 20(1) of the Constitution to prosecute a person on the basis of new law for the old offence, Section 26(1) is violative of Article 20(1) of the Constitution.

8. From the Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Domestic Violence Act, it will be evident that domestic violence is a human right issue and is a serious deterrent to development. After the Vienna Accord, 1994, followed by Beijing Declaration and the Platform for Action (1995), and after the United Nations Committee on Convention on Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, the Central Government, having noticed that domestic violence is widely prevalent but has remained largely invisible in the public domain where a woman is subjected to cruelty by her husband or his relatives, except offence under Section 498A of the I.P.C. no civil law exists, proposed to enact a law keeping in view the rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution of India to provide for remedy under the civil law, which is intended to protect the women from being victims of domestic violence and to prevent occurrence of domestic violence in the society. It covers those women who are or have been in relationship with the abuser where both parties have lived together and shared a household and are related by consanguinity, marriage or through a relationship in the nature of marriage or adoption. It provides for right of a women to reside in her matrimo




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top