SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Guj) 182

M.R.SHAH
DIPAKBHAI JAYANTILAL PANDYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


( 1 ) RULE. Mr. Dipen Desai, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives the service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent State.

( 2 ) PRESENT petition has been filed by the petitioner original accused for releasing him on bail in connection with the complaint being CR No. I-13 of 2003 registered with Gandhinagar Economic Zone, CID Branch, Gandhinagar for the offences punishable under sections 407, 420, 467, 468, 120b of the Indian Penal Code.

( 3 ) LEARNED advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 12/10/2003; charge has been framed on 7/9/2006 and looking to the backlog pending in the Court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate, number of witnesses to be examined and the documents to be produced in the Criminal Case No. 7 of 2004, it is not likely that the trial is concluded in near future.

( 4 ) LEARNED advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that other co-accused are already released on bail and all the evidences are in the form of documents which are in the custody of the investigating officer and therefore, there is no chance of tampering with the same by the petitioner and therefore, it is r





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top