SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Guj) 88

K.M.THAKER, AKIL KURESHI, K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
SANJAY D. PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates: Paresh Upadhyay, SHIVANG SHUKLA, SUNIT SHAH, VARUN K.PATEL,

K. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, CJ.

( 1 ) THESE Special Civil Applications have been placed before us on a reference made by the learned Single Judge of this Court after having noticed that the Division Bench of this Court in Letters Patent Appeal (Stamp) No. 1333 of 2005 has expressed the opinion that there has been conflict of views between two decisions of the learned Single judge Bench in the case of Kokilaben H. Pancholi v. Development Commissioner, 1998 (2) GCD 1058 (Guj.) and in the case of Mrs. Vibha Vijya Orpadkar v. State of gujarat and others, Special Civil application No. 9748 of 1993 dated 10. 11. 1993 on the question whether the compassionate appointee is obliged to pass the Post Training Examination as provided under the Gujarat Non-Secretariat Clerks and Clerks-cum-Typist (Training and examination) Rules, 1970 for being appointed as Junior Clerk in service.

( 2 ) LEARNED Judge of this Court in kokilaben H. Pancholi v. Development commissioner, (Supra) took the view that compassionate appointment is being made by relaxation of the normal service rules for providing immediate financial assistance to the family of the deceased who dies in harness. Learned Judge pointed out that a














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top