( 1 ) ALL these appeals arise out of the impugned judgment and order and therefore, they are disposed of by this common judgment.

1. 0 Criminal Appeal Nos. 459/2006 and 235/2006 have been preferred by original accused Nos. 1 and 2 respectively against the impugned judgment and order dated 7/2/2006 passed by the learned Presiding officer, Fast Track Court No. 4. Gandhinagar in Sessions Case No. 21/2005, whereby, both original accused Nos. 1 and 2 have been convicted for the offence punishable u/s. 366 IPC. Apart from conviction u/s. 366 IPC, original accused no. 1 has also been convicted for the offence punishable u/s. 376 (g) IPC.

1. 1 For conviction u/s. 366 IPC, both original accused Nos. 1 and 2 have been sentenced to undergo R. I. for five years with fine of Rs. 2000/- and Rs. 5000/-respectively and in default of payment of fine, both have been directed to undergo s. I. for a further period of one month. For conviction u/s. 376 (g) IPC, original accused no. 1 has been sentenced to undergo R. I. for ten years with fine of Rs. 5000/- and in default of payment of fine, S. I. for a further period of one month. Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently for