SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Guj) 350

M.R.SHAH
CHUNILAL KAPOORCHANJI SHAH – Appellant
Versus
YUVRAJ INDUSTRIES LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates: KEDAR B.BINIVALE, MIHIR THAKORE, P.R.THAKKAR, R.S.SANJANWALA, S.N.Soparkar,

M. R. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) RULE. Mr. Kedar Biniwale, learned advocate waives the service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent Nos. 8 and 9 and Mr. P. R. Thakkar, learned Advocate waives the service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent No. 10.

( 2 ) AT the request of the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties, present petition is taken up for final hearing today.

( 3 ) HEARD Mr. S. N. Soparkar, learned senior Advocate appearing with Mr. R. S. Sanjanwala, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Mihir thakore, learned Senior Advocate appearing with Mr. Kedar Biniwale, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 8 and 9 and Mr. P. R. Thakkar, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 10.

( 4 ) BY way of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners - original applicants have prayed for appropriate writ, order and/or direction to quash and set aside the impugned order dtd. 13/12/2008 passed by the learned principal District Judge, Vadodara below application Ex. 35 in Civil Misc. (Arbitration) Application No. 53 of 2007 by which the learned Judge has dismissed the




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top