SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Guj) 635

ABHILASHA KUMARI
GUJ. VIJ. COM. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
BABULAL BIRABHAI RENPARA. – Respondent


Advocates: Lilu K.Bhaya,

JUDGMENT

( 1 ) THIS petition has been preferred invoking the provisions of Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to quash and set aside the judgment and order dated 26-10-2005 passed by the 9th Fast Track Court, Gondal, Camp: Dhoraji in Civil Misc. Appeal No. 8 of 2004 whereby the order dated 22-10-2003 rendered below exh. 5 by the Trial Courtin Regular Civil Suit no. 270 of 2003, has been confirmed.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case, necessary for the decision of the petition are that, the respondent herein, who is a practicing advocate, filed the above mentioned Civil Suit, inter alia, praying for the relief of declaration that the Office of an advocate should be billed as per the 'residential' Tariff by the defendant-Gujarat Electricity Board (now pashchim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd.) who is the respondent in the petition (referred to as 'the Electricity Company' for sort ). Along with the Suit, the plaintiff preferred an application at Exh. 5 for grant of an interlocutory injunction.

( 3 ) THE petitioner (original defendant) filed its reply to the said application, contending that as per the Tariff Order passed by the gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commiss













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top