SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.B.PARDIWALA
Pranjivan Purushottam Zaveri – Appellant
Versus
Dena Bank Through Authorized Officer and/or Assistant – Respondent
J.B. Pardiwala, J.—Petitioners - husband and wife have preferred this Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying for following reliefs:
“(B) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, to quash and set aside the impugned judgment and order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Mumbai dated 15.4.2010 at Annexure-A passed in Appeal No. 291 of 2007, confirming the judgment and order of Debts Recovery Tribunal-I, Ahmedabad dated 31.7.2007 passed in Appeal No. 25/2007 under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to allow the appeal of the petitioners by quashing and setting aside the action Respondent No. 1 taken under Section 13 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 in respect of the disputed Bungalow.
(C) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus and / or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring that security interest is not legal and va
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.