Back
2012 (2) GCD 1110 (Guj) (DB)
Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.H. Waghela &
Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.V. Anjaria
State of Gujarat
Versus
Jayendrasinh Motisinh Zala
Criminal Misc. Application No. 12110 of 20111—Decided on 10/01/2012
[Indian] Electricity Act, 2003 (Central Act 36 of 2003) — Section 135(1)(a) — Theft of electricity — Having unauthorised connection — Acquittal of charge of offence — Appreciation of evidence — Sustainability — Finding of — Having due regard to the evidence Court held that prosecution case stand crippled by dearth of evidence necessary to prove the offence — Neither Panchanama of the place of inspection was recorded nor any recovery of wire or devices used for the theft were recovered — Statement of the occupant of the house bears them impression but same is not identified. Near the them impression name of Rajnaben is written — These is no evidence that who is this Rajnaben — The respondent is also not shown to be owner of the house — That apart sequence of lates and events also show that investigation was tardy — The incident of theft and inspection was on 16.5.2006 whereas evidence in the case was recorded as late as after 14.08.2007 — It is evident from record that complaint was recorded against respondent only on the footing of information than he was owner of the house in question — In such case occupier of the house is also liable for the theft of electricity — In view of the said record finding of trial Court acquitting the respondent can not be challenged — The order of acquittal recorded by the trial Court is not liable to be interfered with.
Held :
Having due regard to the evidence discussed above, the prosecution case stands crippled not only with paucity of evidence, but can be said to have been crumbled by total dearth of evidence necessary to prove the offence. Firstly, neither Panchnama of the place/ house where inspection was carried out was recorded nor was shown any recovery of wires/devices alleged to have been used for alleged theft of electricity and no recovery panchnama was done. Secondly, in statement of the occupant of house (Exh. 17), her thumb impression was not identified. Perusal of the Exh. 17 showed that there was only a thumb impression with words written just beside it that it was thumb impression ‘on behalf of Ranjanben’. Thus, on the very face, it was not shown to be the thumb impression of the person namely Ranjanben, who was stated to have given the statement (Exh. 17). Thirdly, the prosecution failed to show as to who was Ranjanben who was in occupation of house and posed as representative of the respondent. Fourthly, not only that respondent was not shown to be the owner of the house, but nature of his association or connection with the house at which raid was carried out was also not shown or established. Fifthly, the postal endorsement (Exh.15) suggested that in village Mahelav no person with respondent’s name ‘Jayendrasinh Motisinh Zala’, had been staying. [Para 5.1]
From sequence of dates and events on record of the case it is seen that the process of lodging complaint by the competent authority under the Act, and the investigation thereafter, were tardy. The incident of the alleged theft and inspection by the checking squad was on 16.05.2006 and the complaint was forwarded after four months on 19.09.2006. F.I.R. was actually registered by the police as late as on 04.06.2007, which was after a gap of eleven months. Investigating officer recorded statement of the complainant on 14.08.2007 and thereafter statements of other witnesses were recorded. [Para 5.3]
In view of the evidence on record, the findings recorded by the trial Court are plausible, reasonable and proper. The order of acquittal recorded by the trial Court is not liable to be interfered with. [Para 6]
Law Laid Down :
A person in occupation of the premises where from theft of electricity is detected is answerable and liable to be prosecuted and punished.
N.V. Anjaria, J.—State has filed Criminal Misc. Application No. 12110 of 2011 for condonation of delay of 10 days in preferring Criminal Appeal No. 1054 of 2011. Criminal Misc. S Application No. 12109 of 2011 is filed for leave to appeal. Both the applications as well as main Criminal Appeal are placed on Board.
1.1. The Criminal Appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 29.04.2011 by the Special Judge & Additional Sessions Judge, Himmatnagar, Sabarkantha, in Special (Electricity) Case No. 6 of 2008, whereby respondent-accused is acquitted of charge of offence under Section 135(1)(a) of the Electricity Act, 2003, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for sake of brevity).
2. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor made available copies of evidence adduced before the trial Court, and took us through relevant evidence enabling us to take up consideration of appeal at this stage itself. We heard learned Assistant Public Prosecutor in detail.
3. As per the prosecution case arising upon the complaint (Exh.11) by Deputy Engineer, Uttar Gujarat Vij Company Limited (UGVCL), Sub Division Talod, that respondent committed offence of theft of electricity by having unauthorized connection at his residence at village Mahelav, Taluka Talod taken from low tension line of UGVCL passing nearby. The checking squad of the Vij Company on inspection in the house on 16.05.2006 found that even as respondent was not customer of the company, had taken electricity connection for domestic consumption directly from the nearby pole. Calculation report (Exh. 14) and supplementary bill dated 16.05.2006 (Exh. 13) for Rs. 16,001.10 towards such electricity consumption came to be issued to the respondent.
3.1 Based on the complaint, FIR was registered and respondent was charged for offence under Section 135(1)(a) of Electricity Act, 2003. The charge sheet came to be filed before learned Judicial Magistrate (First Class), and thereafter, the case was committed to the Court of Sessions where respondent-accused was tried.
4. The prosecution examined Chaganbhai Makwana (PW-1-Exh.10), who was complainant and employee of the Vij Company, working as Deputy Engineer at the relevant time. He deposed that upon inspection in the house of the respondent by the checking squad, theft of 210 watt electricity consumption was detected, pursuant to which statement of representative of respondent, came to be recorded and her thumb impression was taken. He stated that inspection report dated 16.05.2006 was given to him for further process, and in connection therewith, supplementary bill for theft of electricity for Rs. 16,001.10ps was issued to respondent. Thereafter, in September 2006, complaint was lodged before Gujarat Electricity Board Police Station, Ahmedabad.
4.1 Shilpaben Amrutbhai Patel, employee and Deputy Engineer, UGVCL (PW-2, Exh.16), who headed the checking squad, and Mohamad Yunus, employee and Senior Engineer, UGVCL (PW-3, Exh. 18), who was member of the checking squad, were also examined by the prosecution. PW-2 stated in her deposition that when she had gone to village Mahelav with checking party, it was found that eventhough respondent was not customer of UGVCL, electrical connection was directly obtained by him from electricity lines passing nearby and electricity was being unauthorizedly consumed. Statement of one Ranjanben, occupant of house and described as representative and sister-in-law (Bhabhi) of respondent, was recorded and her thumb impression was obtained below her statement (Exh. 17). This witness stated that accused was not present at the time of checking, and further admitted in her cross-examination that she did not know the accused. She stated in cross that as Bhabhi of respondent informed that the house in question belonged to respondent, case was registered against respondent. PW-3 also stated similar facts, identified thumb impression of Ranjanben and signatures of himself as wells as PW-2.
4.2 Jitendrasinh Jujarsinh Rahevar, work
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
