SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Guj) 89

2012 (3) GCD 1863 (Guj) (DB)
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ravi R. Tripathi &
Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.B. SHAH
State of Gujarat
Versus
Bhagwanji Karu Borecha & Ors.
Criminal Appeal No. 752 of 1991—Decided on 22/02/2012

Advocates:
Appearance :
Mr. L.R. Pujari, Addl. Public Prosecutor, for the Appellant No. 1.
Mr. Haresh N. Joshi for Mr. P.M. Thakkar, for the Opponents No. 1 - 4, 6.
Abated, for the Opponent No. 5.

Point in Issue :
Whether in the facts of the case order of acquittal recorded by trial Court is just and proper.

Headnote:Head Note :

       [Indian] Penal Code, 1860 (Central Act 45 of 1860) — Sections 143, 147, 148 and 302 read with Section 149 — Bombay Police Act (Bom. Act No. 22 of 1951) — Section 135(1) — Murder — Acquittal — Appreciation of evidence — Finding as to — Sustainability — Court observed that in the case deceased was brutally beaten and was caused as many as 18 injuries with corresponding internal injuries resulling into his death before the Court reach the hospital but there is no evidence coming forward on record to support prosecution story — In the facts reasons given by trial Court for acquitting the appellants are plausible, cogent and convincing — Thus in the light of the evidence order of acquittal passed by trial Court can not be faulted.

       Held :

       On perusal of the Judgement and order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, this Court finds that the Court has rightly not believed the case of the prosecution and has acquitted the accused. No doubt, the deceased was brutally beaten and was caused as many as 18 external injuries, causing corresponding internal injuries resulting into death of the person even before he could reach the hospital, but that is not the ground on which the accused can be held guilty when there is no evidence coming forward on record. [Para 7]

       In the present appeal, Court find that the reasons given by the trial Court are plausible, cogent and convincing. Thus, in light of the evidence on record, it cannot be said that the Trial Court has committed any error in acquitting the accused. [Para 9]

       Law Laid Down :

       In acquittal appeal the appellate Court is neither required to re-write the Judgment nor to give a fresh reasoning when reasons assigned by the Court below are found just and proper.

Judgment

Ravi R. Tripathi, J.—State of Gujarat is before this Court being aggrieved by judgement and order dated 1st July, 1991 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jamnagar in Sessions Case No. 56 of 1990. The learned Additional Sessions Judge was pleased to acquit accused- Respondents No. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 (appeal qua Accused No. 5 has abated vide order dated 19th October, 1993 as he has expired) for the offence under Sections 143, 147, 148 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 149 of the IPC and Section 135(1) of the Bombay Police Act.

2. The case of the prosecution as narrated in Para 2 of the judgement is that the deceased-Suleman Alias ‘Pagal Aiyub’ lent an amount of Rs. 10,000/- to Accused No. 1-Bhagwanji Kalubhai, one of the accused persons, and the said amount was frequently demanded by deceased-Suleman from Accused No. 1. In this connection, Accused No. 1 had called deceased-Suleman to Village ‘Amaran’ by saying that this amount would be given to deceased-Suleman at Village Amaran. But on the day of the incident in question, viz. the day subsequent to Holi (Dhuleti), the accused persons of this case having joined together came by jeep near S.T. Bus Stand in Village Amaran. The accused persons armed with iron pipes, scythes and axes descended from the jeep and out of the accused persons, Accused No. 1 came hurling expletives into the hotel of the complainant-Dhiru Popat and asking, “Where is Pagal?” Therefore, at this point of time deceased-Suleman Alias Pagal who was sitting in the hotel of the complainant-Dhirubhai Popat started running away from there. Accused No. 1 thereupon ran after him and Accused No. 1 and other accused persons surrounded deceased-Suleman Alias Pagal behind the S.T. Bus Stand and as Accused No. 1 armed with a pipe inflicted a pipe blow to deceased-Suleman; consequently he fell down. Thereafter, the other accused persons armed with axes, scythes and pipes gave blows to deceased-Suleman. At this time, other persons of the village had also gathered there. At the time of this incident, the witnesses Husainmiya Miyabhai and Shabbirhusain Ahmedbhai advised the accused not to beat him in this manner. But the accused persons warned them not to intervene, hence no person ventured to reach there. Thereafter, the accused persons having beaten deceased-Suleman Alias Pagal in this manner, embarked on the jeep and went away from the place of the incident. After departure of the accused persons the Police Head Constables, Shri Muljibhai and Shri Umedsinh arrived at the place of incident within a short time and on deceased-Suleman being asked by them, deceased-Suleman stated that “the accused Bhago and his brothers have beaten him”. Thereafter, as the condition of deceased-Suleman was serious, Head Constable, Shri Muljibhai suggested to take deceased-Suleman to the hospital at Morbi for treatment, therefore, witnesses-Ahmedmiya Alimiya, Abumiya, Bavabhai and Abbashusain Bukhari took deceased-Suleman to hospital at Morbi by a taxi but deceased-Suleman expired on the way. The deceased could not be admitted in hospital at Morbi, his body was brought to village Amaran. Thereafter, body of deceased-Suleman was sent for postmortem to the Government Hospital, Jodiya but as there was no facility of Medical Officer, postmortem of deceased-Suleman was performed in Irvin Hospital at Jamnagar. In the meanwhile, as the Investigating Officer in this case, PSI, Shri Rakeshkumar received information about this incident, he had returned to Village Amaran on the day of incident and after going there, he had taken over the charge of the investigation of this case. He has taken the complaint of the complainant-Dhirubhai Popat and he has recorded statements of witnesses-Shabbirhusain Ahmedmiya, Husainmiya Miyabhai, etc. and he has drawn the Inquest Panchnama of the dead body of deceased-Suleman Alias Pagal. As he has stated earlier, “his dead body was first sent to the hospital at Jodia for postmortem and t














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top